-Restorative
justice could've saved thousands of U.S. troops and innocent Iraqi lives-
On March 20, 2003, The United States officially went to war with Iraq for three reasons, according to at the time president, George W. Bush: Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator, Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction, and because Hussein allegedly supported terrorism with links to al Qaeda.
Bush’s arguments for the war on Iraq were not justified in my opinion.
The Middle Eastern country never presented an actual threat of danger to the United States.
“..Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm. We agree that the Iraqi dictator must not be permitted to threaten America and the world with horrible poisons, and diseases, and gases, and atomic weapons.”
George W. Bush, October 7, 2002
Hussein ruthlessly dictated Iraq as president for more than 30 years but never attempted to dictate America. Numerous dictators, such as al Qaeda aid Isaias Afewerki of Eritrea, are found throughout the world. It is not the United State’s moral responsibility to conquer such dictators and shape their societies into whichever way they please. The U.S. has done such in Iraq throughout 11 years of war, and history is repeating today with Afghanistan. With active U.S. military on base in different countries, America has become a dictator to less powerful regions including the Middle East. American troop’s killing sprees have killed thousands. It’s a bit hypocritical in my point of view.
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”
George W. Bush, March 17, 2003
Twenty-six countries are suspected to occupy weapons of mass destruction of either nuclear, biological, or chemical composition. Does this mean America should go to war to obtain such weapons? Of course not. Why does America hold the power to decide which countries can possess weapons of mass destruction? Nations beside our own need forms of protection as well. Bush was persistent that Iraq held weapons of mass destruction but none were ever found. Apparently the CIA had misinformation. Figures.
"We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in Baghdad."
George W. Bush, February 8, 2003
The U.S. Department of State recognizes 51 terrorist organizations. No evidence ever linked Hussein to al Qaeda. Though alleged at the time, Hussein was not associated with the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers or the Pentagon. Bush tried to justify the Iraq war with its al Qaeda connections even though the terrorist group is known to have cells worldwide. He stated later in September of 2003 that, “We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."
Article Four, Section Four of the Constitution requires the U.S.’s protection of America against invasion. The horrific crimes of 9/11 needed not to go unpunished, however, retaliation was dealt with in the wrong way. Albert Einstein once said, “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” You can’t solve terrorism with more terrorism.
America needs to stop taking actions that provoke terrorism. Rather than a widespread attack on Iraq; a country often forgotten by Americans to also inhabit faultless men, women, and children, the U.S. should of sought restorative justice from al Qaeda establisher, Osama bin Laden.
LittleMissLibertarian
Miranda Pagan
On March 20, 2003, The United States officially went to war with Iraq for three reasons, according to at the time president, George W. Bush: Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator, Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction, and because Hussein allegedly supported terrorism with links to al Qaeda.
Bush’s arguments for the war on Iraq were not justified in my opinion.
The Middle Eastern country never presented an actual threat of danger to the United States.
“..Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm. We agree that the Iraqi dictator must not be permitted to threaten America and the world with horrible poisons, and diseases, and gases, and atomic weapons.”
George W. Bush, October 7, 2002
Hussein ruthlessly dictated Iraq as president for more than 30 years but never attempted to dictate America. Numerous dictators, such as al Qaeda aid Isaias Afewerki of Eritrea, are found throughout the world. It is not the United State’s moral responsibility to conquer such dictators and shape their societies into whichever way they please. The U.S. has done such in Iraq throughout 11 years of war, and history is repeating today with Afghanistan. With active U.S. military on base in different countries, America has become a dictator to less powerful regions including the Middle East. American troop’s killing sprees have killed thousands. It’s a bit hypocritical in my point of view.
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”
George W. Bush, March 17, 2003
Twenty-six countries are suspected to occupy weapons of mass destruction of either nuclear, biological, or chemical composition. Does this mean America should go to war to obtain such weapons? Of course not. Why does America hold the power to decide which countries can possess weapons of mass destruction? Nations beside our own need forms of protection as well. Bush was persistent that Iraq held weapons of mass destruction but none were ever found. Apparently the CIA had misinformation. Figures.
"We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in Baghdad."
George W. Bush, February 8, 2003
The U.S. Department of State recognizes 51 terrorist organizations. No evidence ever linked Hussein to al Qaeda. Though alleged at the time, Hussein was not associated with the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers or the Pentagon. Bush tried to justify the Iraq war with its al Qaeda connections even though the terrorist group is known to have cells worldwide. He stated later in September of 2003 that, “We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."
Article Four, Section Four of the Constitution requires the U.S.’s protection of America against invasion. The horrific crimes of 9/11 needed not to go unpunished, however, retaliation was dealt with in the wrong way. Albert Einstein once said, “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” You can’t solve terrorism with more terrorism.
America needs to stop taking actions that provoke terrorism. Rather than a widespread attack on Iraq; a country often forgotten by Americans to also inhabit faultless men, women, and children, the U.S. should of sought restorative justice from al Qaeda establisher, Osama bin Laden.
LittleMissLibertarian
Miranda Pagan
No comments:
Post a Comment